What Was Wrought by Yesterday’s Demonstration to Exonerate Kellner

Chaim Levin is to be commended for acting on the spur of the moment to call a demonstration with only two day’s notice that succeeded in bringing major attention to the unfair prosecution of Samuel Kellner and yet more media coverage.

Rabbi Nuchem Rosenberg
Free Kellner Rally (7-11-13)

I have written a lot about this hideous miscarriage of justice. Hella Winston has written much more and her writing is informed by immense amounts of research and professional reporting. It was good to see Gary Rosenblatt, editor of the Jewish Week, praise her work.

Her report on the demonstration shows that many others are realizing that the prosecution of Kellner is a gross miscarriage of justice. She quotes Kenneth Thompson, who is running against Hynes in the September primary.

What the DA has to explain in the Kellner case is how is it possible that two different units in his office, the Sex Crimes unit, which brought the case against Mr. Lebovits, and the Rackets Division, which brought the case against Mr. Kellner, brought two cases that are diametrically opposed. It does not make sense. And both of those cases are still pending. How is that possible?

The question is partly rhetorical. The sad truth is that the Kellner case was brought at the behest of Lebovits and pumped into Michael (Mike) Vecchione’s Rackets Division by Lebovits’ attorney, Arthur (Artie) Aidala, a very close friend of DA Charles J (Joe) Hynes.

Winston quotes Abe George, another candidate for DA,

“It’s amazing to me that when Sam first approached the DA’s office to say his son was abused, they said, “That’s not good enough, you’ve got to go out there and find more victims,’ … Can you imagine, you’re a victim of a rape and you come to the DA’s office and they say, ‘You’ve got to find more cases against this guy who is raping people?’ … But Sam does that and then all the sudden, there are more powerful people [who come to them], and instead of protecting the victim, they [go] after Sam. There’s an internal conflict between guys like Mike Vecchione and the Sex Crimes unit.

Obviously, Thompson and George, as candidates for DA, have a political interest in criticizing Hynes. But they are not fools. If they thought Hynes had a chance of pulling off a conviction, they would steer clear of the controversy. As experienced prosecutors they smell a rat and anticipate a fiasco.

Meanwhile, I assume Joe Hynes is furious about this fusilade, especially since he is getting a ton of negative media coverage by all the major outlets including the New York Times.

The word in the DA’s office is that Mike Vecchione is trying to salvage his deteriorating reputation by smearing Kellner. It seems he passed out an excerpt of Dershowitz’s appellate brief to a reporter in an attempt to tilt media coverage. That excerpt is also circulating by email in the Hasidic community though I do not know if it came from the reporter, Vecchione, Artie Aidala, Dershowitz, or the Lebovits camp. It gets harder and harder to tell these actors apart.

I don’t think this excerpt will work its way into media coverage. Any responsible reporter will contact Kellner’s attorney, Michael Dowd, who will refute the claim with some devastating facts, also on the record.


3 thoughts on “What Was Wrought by Yesterday’s Demonstration to Exonerate Kellner

  1. My head is spinning. Consigliere ADA Michael Vecchione, who essentially runs the Brooklyn DA organization office on behalf of his “Boss” Joe Hynes is collaborating with Arthur Aidala, a defense lawyer who represents a convicted child rapist and is also capo bastone to Hynes’ political campaign. And all of them are now taking direction from Consigliere Alan Dershowitz, who is also defense counsel to the convicted child rapist.

    Huh? Only in Brooklyn.

  2. D.A. Hynes’ decision to postpone Kellner’s trial may prove to have been a serious mistake in timing. If the case against Kellner had been dismissed on Thursday with an apology (however hypocritical an apology would have been at this point), Hynes could hope that voters would forget about it before the primary. Now he will have to face questions next month concerning what, if anything, his new “investigation” has come up with. Because Kellner’s pending case remains current news, more publications may be interested in running stories about this humble hassidic hero during the expected news doldrums of August, and none of them will make Hynes or his office look good. A certain publicity-seeking lawyer may suffer severe whiplash as the supposed miscarriage of justice he has been driving slams into reverse and he finds himself facing the wrong way. God bless Mr. Kellner, HW, YL, CL, and all you other good guys, and good Shabbos!

See Commenting policy ( http://wp.me/pFbfD-Kk )

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s