Brooklyn DA Developments since the 2nd Hynes Election Defeat

My apologies for hasty writing without links. I will try and clean up on Saturday evening. But I wanted to get this out now.

Overall the mood is chipper. Most staff gave up believing that Hynes would even have a chance to win. Productivity is way down, in a sort of an early Christmas season.

Rumor has it that Dino Amoroso has landed a new job. Dino, who was personally thanked in Hynes’s concession speech for his role in the campaign, is known around the office as Hynes’ consigliere. He is in charge of personnel and the defense against the Jabbar Collins lawsuit for wrongful imprisonment involving violations of his civil rights by Michael Vecchione and others. He also violated NYC ethics law and served as Hynes attorney in a number of real estate transactions. Dino, according to the rumor is slated to be selected by Governor Cuomo to head the new Catskills gaming authority to be created as a result of the referendum vote on Tuesday. This is up Dino’s ally since he was head of Nassau’s OTB till his patron lost an election.

Speaking of Catskills Casinos, Hasidic organizations urged a yes vote. They proffered arguments about helping the economy but it seems they have more direct motives. Rumor has it that they are wired to have some of their real estate leased for the casinos. It seems Hasidim, like Native Americans, have gotten into the gambling business. This adds a whole new level of meaning to the expression, “A member of the tribe.”

Word is that there are some personnel being penalized by various actions to try and smooth out some irregularities in cases the DA would rather not deal with straightforwardly. I sent highly specific requests for information to the DA’s press office but, as usual, they have not bothered to answer. I do not take it personally. More important media than Frum Follies are also being ignored.

The Baruch Lebovits case which Hynes promised to bring to trial is nowhere near the trial stage. That suits me fine since I think the Thompson administration will do a better job. But what is scary is that there is talk, that I find persuasive, that the DA is planning to give Lebovits a sweetheart plea bargain of time served (a little over a year) in return for pleading guilty to 7 E felonies which netted him a sentence of 11-32 years when he was first convicted. The conviction was overturned on appeal because the prosecution failed to turn over about 3 pages of police notes. More shocking is the recent revelation by Hella Winston that the DA failed to use a very incriminating police supervised recording of Lebovits in which he all but admits he sexually abused the victim in this case. The discouraging aspects of the case also include a failure to follow-up with additional victims of Lebovits willing to testify and the failure of sex crimes to challenge known false allegations against Kellner or to respond to witness tampering and witness intimidation. One almost wonders if Miss Gregory, the prosecutor in the case is behaving like a surgeon eager to bury her mistakes. But it won’t wash. If she cuts a cruddy deal the cadaver of the case will be exhumed in January, and it and her will be given a full post-mortem.

Many activists are clear that this case is to the orthodox community what the Emmet Till case was to African-American community. We will not rest till justice is done. There are the other victims of Lebovits like the groom Motty Borger who jumped to his death on his wedding night, like Meir Dascalowitz who in turn went on to rape other boys, like the dozens of drug addict victims of rape by Lebovits, and on and on. I believe the Thompson transition team appreciates that they cannot credibly retain the trust of those who supported them unless they get to the bottom of this case.

I hope the outgoing administration will honor their public obligation and either prosecute, get a plea bargain of seven years, or hand over the case in good shape for the Thompson folks. If not, I predict with great confidence that the scandal will not die down.

6 thoughts on “Brooklyn DA Developments since the 2nd Hynes Election Defeat

  1. Lopin, weren’t you the one who reported that the victim in the Lebovitz case has accepted a settlement, which he claims to have fully satisfied him? If this is true, then like all similar cases in which Hasidic victims settle, the likelihood is incredibly high that the case will be pleaded out. The victim will beg the DA for time served so he can avoid the pain of going through another trial, even though his real reason is that he got his money and he feels that’s enough, along with the “exposure” of Lebovitz to the community. Disgusting, but reality in these sick cases.

    • Shouldn’t you helping The Boss pack up his crap and cart it back to his QUEENS COUNTY lily white gate community, where he can wait for his indictments for all the fraud he committed as KINGS COUNTY DA?

    • A financial settlement of civil cases in not in place of a criminal settlement. Normally, abuse victims wait until after criminal convictions to pursue financial settlements of damages, something not addressed by criminal judgments. In this case Lebovits unusually paid out beforehand, something a jury is likely to view as further proof of guilt. A payment in return for a promise not to testify is a crime and if it occurred, the DA should be investigating and prosecuting it. However, I have certainly never reported that the settlement had any such illegal component. To the best of my knowledge the victim has not in any way precluded a willingness to testify.

  2. Why should anyone in the KCDA’s office give Lebovits a break at this point? The Hynes loyalists (assuming they would be “loyal” under the circumstances) surely feel no obligation to the Chassidishe machers who didn’t back Hynes in November, and who else would have any reason to go easy on Lebovits — unless, as Truther says, the victim is unwilling to proceed? Surely the ADA’s know on which side their bread is buttered, and won’t let it fall buttered side down.

  3. Guys, don’t miss the point. If a deal was made, this may mean that the victim WANTS to disappear, whether or not his settlement agreement says anything about doing so. That’s how these cases go down: the Chasidic victim makes a deal, gets what he wants, and runs away. I fear this is about to happen, just as it has in so many prior cases.

    • Truther, don’t miss the point that his agreement leaves him free to testify. What’s if he decides to do that. As you can imagine he has his reasons. I can verify that having spoken to him. If the money is his, free and unencumbered he can do it. If it isn’t free and unencumbered the DA should have been looking into witness tampering and bribery.

See Commenting policy ( )

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s