Breaking- Krawatskys Suing Parents, Activist, and Journalists in MD Courts

Maryland court records show that that Rabbi Shmuel (Stephen) Krawatsky and his wife are again suing  for defamation against those making or reporting allegations that Krawatsky (aka Rabbi K) sexually abused children in Camp Shoresh. The suit was filed on 10/16/18. The suit names two sets of parents who each allege that their son was sexually abused by Rabbi K. The Krawatskys are also suing  activist Chaim Levin, the Jewish Week (JW) which reported on the allegations, and the reporter who wrote the JW story, Hannah Dreyfus.  Continue reading

Advertisements

Krawatsky Never Expected to Win His Lawsuit. It Was a PR Ploy

It is my opinion that Rabbi Shmuel (Steven) Krawatsky and his wife acted in bad faith when they filed his defamation lawsuit against the Avrunins, the Beckers (both parents of children they alleged he abused) and blogger/activist Chaim Levin.

Krawatsky suit dismissed 9-21-18I say that because they filed a legally flawed suit that would be dismissed without any discovery phase, subpoenas, depositions, or a trial. This was good for them because it meant the truth would not be exposed in a trial.

They filed it in federal court when it could only be filed in Maryland courts if both the plaintiff (Rabbi K) and one pair of defendants (the Beckers) both lived in MD. They could have dropped the Beckers and just sued the Avrunins (who had moved to Georgia) and Chaim Levin (who lived in NY). But instead they filed in federal court even though every such case goes through a jurisdiction review before anything proceeds. And of course the jurisdiction review determined that the case did not qualify. Continue reading

Krawatsky’s Defamation Lawsuit Will Likely Go Down the Tubes, Just Like Bodkins’

 

07-3

Krawatsky

I have reposted “Rabbi Avrohom Chaim Levin’s Close Call With Justice” which I first posted in August, 2014, because of the eerie similarities of the Yisroel Bodkins case in North Miami Beach to the recently announced defamation lawsuit by Rabbi Shmuel (Steven) Krawatsky against blogger/anti-abuse activist Chaim Levin and two sets of parents whose children reported their alleged abuse to the police and protective services. 

In both cases, we have popular yeshiva teachers who loved spending time with kids even on their off hours. In both cases, several parents brought their children to the authorities to report these yeshiva teachers for sexual abuse of boys while they were working in summer camps. In both cases the official responses were inconclusive but the teachers lost their jobs. In both cases a variety of community leaders, including the heads of the schools that fired them, nevertheless publicly insisted on their innocence of child molesting. And in both cases funds were raised for lawyers to uphold the claims of innocence.

Yisroel Bodkins

Yisroel Bodkins

In the end, Bodkins withdrew his lawsuit when the pre-trial discovery process, including depositions, exposed how insiders who indeed assumed Bodkins’ guilt acquiesced to rabbinical pressure to protect his reputation. I expect the exact same thing to happen with Krawatsky’s lawsuit.

I believe it is a PR stunt which will evaporate long before it even gets close to a trial. But, if it ever makes it to trial, I believe it will strip away the ambiguities of the case and demolish claims by Krawatsky and his backers. 

∞∞∞∞∞∞

Rabbi Avrohom Chaim
Levin’s Close Call With Justice (8/29/14)

Continue reading

Could He Be Talking About Baltimore?

Dr. Michael Salamon, a frum therapist with a specialty in child abuse, just posted an article in the Times of Israel, Communities that Protect Abusers. He writes:

What happens when an actual neighborhood community has a terrible history of responding to accusations of abuse? A community that has never actually taken up the struggle to confront and isolate childhood sexual abusers from its midst? The answer is simple. Abusers tend to gather there as a last refuge. And in their way, they will go on to charm and groom the entire neighborhood and the community it represents. There they find new victims. They get involved in youth activities as teachers, sports coaches, camp counselors and go on to find vulnerable children to attack. When their victims finally come forward, when police are finally called in to investigate, these communities far too often rally around the predator. They dispute charges. They help hire attorneys to represent the abusers; attorneys known for their ability to intimidate protective services workers, and the families that support the victims in their quest for justice. They write articles for newspapers in support of the abusers bending facts to make the victims look like false accusers. Continue reading

An Open Letter to the Beth Tfiloh Board of Trustees

Signatures are being solicited for this open letter asking Beth Tfiloh Dahan Community School of Baltimore to bring in an independent investigator to look into their handling of sexual abuse allegations about Rabbi Shmuel Krawatsky and Dr. Jonathan Lasson and implementing any findings regarding policy and dismissals of culpable personnel.
The signers commit to withholding support (e.g., $)  until its demands are met.
The core group that organized this letter are Beth Tfiloh alumni but they welcome the signatures of anyone who is or was part of the Beth Tfiloh community.
Dear Beth Tfiloh Board of Trustees,
We, the undersigned members of Beth Tfiloh Dahan Community School community, are deeply disappointed by the discovery of Beth Tfiloh’s apparent failure to promptly address allegations of abuse perpetrated by Rabbi Shmuel Krawatsky. We are also highly concerned by its recent employment of Dr. Jonathan Lasson, an individual formally sanctioned for inappropriate professional behavior. Finally, we are distressed by what appears to be Beth Tfiloh’s failure to take accountability or to identify a plan of preventative action in its response.

Continue reading

Should Baltimore’s Beth Tfiloh Trust Rabbi K and Should Parents Trust Beth Tfiloh

In Scotland a jury can return a verdict of guilty, innocent or not proven. This goes back to 18th century and it was also called the bastard verdict. Maryland uses a similar system for allegations of child abuse. At the end of an investigation, the report can conclude that action is indicated (e.g. removing a child from a home or a teacher from a job), ruled out or unsubstantiated.

Ruled out is a clean bill of health. Unsubstantiated is not! The name of the alleged offender is retained in a database so schools and child care centers can check on individuals when making employment decisions. This brings me to Rabbi Shmuel (Stephen) Krawatsky, known to kids as Rabbi K who at different times was classified as indicated or unsubstantiated by the child protective services agency of Frederick County, Maryland.

Rabbi K is a very friendly popular guy with younger kids. He is a 6th grade teacher at Beth Tfiloh in Baltimore and a youth leader at Suburban Orthodox synagogue in the Baltimore area. Since these allegations he no longer works at the Shoresh day camp in Frederick County or in the Orthodox Union’s Yachad youth program. For months he was also suspended by the Beth Tfiloh though it was done without any official announcement. Continue reading